Gnome vs kde plasma 2020 You can use your calendar, drive, contacts and most of Google services with Online Account option. KDE Plasma dan GNOME adalah dua lingkungan desktop terbaik untuk Linux. I use gnome because I like its simplicity and my laptop has enough power to handle it. KDE plasma is the latest KDE desktop environment, or rather call it a workspace environment is written in Qml and C++. org, appimagehub. Integrates with most Google Services. Better UI design language. I know you can customize the hell out of KDE, so I tried it again fairly recently. I'm not a person who prefers simplicity to more functionality but when it comes to Gnome vs KDE I just love the simplicity of Gnome. "A minimal KDE is installed with: sudo apt install kde-plasma-desktop . If you dont have much experience with linux go with Gnome. If there’s anything that I learned from all of those years of distro hopping it’s that you can’t go wrong with any of those three desktop environments. I use both KDE plasma 5 with Debian 9 and XFCE 4. 36+). Then in kde you get a kde partition manager where as in gnome and xfce it is a different program or even a terminal application. think by now that linux distros would have figured out how to make the desktop look and feel like something from the 2020's not I tried Manjaro ARM with KDE, Ubuntu Focal with Gnome 3. 18 included from Plasma. Plasma 6 looks fantastic, though, and I can see myself recommending it to people without worries. X. the only thing i prefer Hello, I’ve been using KDE Plasma 6 for a while and the ram usage is really absurd. I'm planning to switch this to Debian though. When I’m in Gnome, I can load about 30% fewer plugins than in KDE or XFCE in the same project on the same computer. From these, KDE Plasma was the most heavy weight and especially the gnome results were surprising, Ram usage of the shell process that makes up the whole desktop is just slightly over 100MB and the CPU usage is slim even with a lot of action. The GNOME vs. There was a big discrepancy sometimes, like 300-400 MB difference between the three runs. Try them both out and see with one you like more. 12 LTS in Leap 15. gnome'dan çok daha kolay özelleştirilebilir ve daha stabildir. License-Programming Language-Widget Toolkit-Type-Default Desktop Environment-Progamming Language-Main Usage-Available On-Available on-Price- I have been using plasma on arch for around two years now. I'll use the Linux distribution for Programming and web browsing. So from my experience Gnome it is about 30% resource heavier than KDE or XFCE. Sometimes these new features have issues (see recent triple buffering) but the KDE Team does really quick fix them commonly. Its simplified approach follows usability standards for clarity and consistency between apps. But for now I am sticking with my Mint 19. I want to know which is suitable for me KDE or GNOME and also help me by suggesting a Linux distribution for my needs. KDE and Gnome use a ton of ram compared to Xfce, but this will only matter if you don't have very much or are running applications that would benefit from an I've been using GNOME for the last 3~4 years, and one of the reasons I stayed with GNOME were because The app manager for GNOME is decently touch screen friendly (not the best, but it's workable). XFCE. This is identical to GNOME. Yeah it runs bit heavier than gnome but you have to add extensions into gnome among other things. 3 or 16 will have the next LTS after 5. 2! And it is available for immediate download. More in general, KDE son 10 yılını gnome kullanarak geçirmiş biri olarak kde (plasma) cevabını verdiğim karşılaştırma. So for the people who use either Plasma or GNOME, I guess my question is why you chose one over the having used both kde and i3 for about a year, here's my take: the 2 main differences are: Tiling vs floating WM and prebaked shell vs a fully customized one. Yes, 400 additional MB's to have Gnome-Extensions, that's a bit too much for me. Neon is the name of another Ubuntu based distribution that also uses Plasma and is maintained by KDE directly. If you have never used GNOME, you’ll find it easy to use due to its simplicity. The Verdict. On the Linux desktop today, we have two dominant IPC technologies in use between applications and the desktop environment: Wayland and D-Bus. KDE means K Desktop Environment and is a workspace system that does not require a Command Line Interface but can run with Windows, Droid, and other platforms. g. 0. gnome kullandığım zamanlarda yapmaya çalıştığım ama içindeki bug'lar yüzünden yamalı bohçaya dönen Originally published at thekrishna. Unpopular opinion (and probably downvoted): Plasma has never been as stable as Gnome at least in my experience (and I have both: workstation laptop uses Gnome and my gaming rig uses Plasma, the second one is a constant headache since I migrated the desktop to Plasma due to Steam Deck a couple of Fedora releases ago; I expected Plasma 6 to KDE is an international community creating free and open source software. Available as a standalone desktop environment with I've been using both in the last 6 months, distro jumping between Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Fedora Workstation and Fedora KDE, and I tend to go back to Fedora Gnome, because it works. After Plasma 5 was released, the KDE team begin to focus more on making Plasma use on resources, while maintain the same level of customization. GNOME means GNU Network Object Model Environment and is a desktop application available on Linux. Salah satu hal pertama yang Anda pelajari tentang Linux adalah apa yang Anda lihat di layar Anda When comparing Gnome vs KDE Plasma, the Slant community recommends KDE Plasma for most people. KDE does implement quite much faster new protocols/features. I love Gnome's design language and how everything works. 1 to 5. 23 (the 25th anniversary) update has been one of the best updates to KDE since i started using it I fixed a lot of bugs, sanded down out a lot of rough edges, finally fixed the animations on Xorg and greatly improved the KDE wayland experience. Plasma introduced a protocol for negotiation that later became xdg-decoration and of course, since the point of the protocol is supporting CSD approach by GNOME when clients pretend it, it assumes CSD and SSD as an option provided by Plasma. 2 and Plasma will be 5. If a lot of them start with K - you're on KDE. kde'nin bug dolu olduğu ve sistem kaynaklarını hunharca kullandığı dönem çoktan geride kalmış. For me the ultimate desktop environment choice is KDE Plasma! I like it SDDM is a smoother experiuence with Plasma, probably, while the same could be said for Gnome and GDM3. Installing one should prompt you to select the one you want to be used, and you can re-select via the command sudo dpkg-reconfigure gdm3 (or sddm, etc) Actually GNOME and KDE are the only ones that are Wayland ready, and Wayland-only. The prior is not true fro Gnome and KDE, for environment variables they manage through their settings GUIs, like proxy environment variables. Please visit https://bugs. kwin will have support for 'true' fractional scaling by plasma 5. GNOME requires extra tools for customization with limited KDE Vs GNOME Vs Xfce; which one is faster? Xfce is faster than KDE and GNOME. gnome is limiting as you can't truly customize the panels. You‘ll see very quickly if you like tiling or not. Lots of features added around even small releases mainly due to a very BIG number of KDE volunteers who might make it seem like a community project. This isn't Fedora. Plasma (initially only KDE, which is now the name of the Graphics apps 'feel smoother' on gnome than on KDE plasma. XFCE is generally lighter and more minimal. You can show your Google Calendar events on the Gnome's default calendar Personally, I like KDE way more then Gnome. And many people dont like it really. The Plasma project from KDE has many such projects, so if you have a GNOME desktop and want to switch you may end up with a multi gigabyte install. The free graphical desktop field is dominated by two large software collections: GNOME and Plasma by KDE. KDE slapstick wars bothers me a bit since both, at a distance, seem super polished and consistent. So I went back to Gnome lol. A rolling release distro featuring a user-friendly installer, tested updates and a community of friendly users for support. This is perfect for those who are coming from GNOME to KDE Plasma. I use both daily. If you have an nvidia gpu, then use Xorg. 36 and the old standard image with Mate. Especially the System Tray. The best option would be to create two virtual machines, one with gnome and one with plasma, or a live usb, then you can decide which one you prefer the most! GNOME. Plasma is another good choice and what i used before gnome for a while. KDE Plasma. KDE, GNOME, and XFCE are all DE. Dolphin and Okular are reasons enough for me to stick with KDE everywhere. I like Plasma more, I'm using KDE-Plasma on one of my laptops running Manjaro. But over time I sort of "grew up" with Gnome on Ubuntu. The post turned into the most popular we have ever published by a I don't love KDE Plasma or Gnome. A quick overview of what’s new since January: KDE Plasma Gnome was surprisingly a lot better and more fun to use than the previous two DEs I mentioned but I still wanted to try KDE Plasma so I installed it alongside gnome and tried it out, I hated it. It's finally time to compare KDE vs XFCE resource usages and performance! Which is faster? Which is "lighter"? Which provides the best gaming performance?The Gnome vs Ccinnamon is usually more if a ui style question than a customization question, I hate the Gnome way of doing things, KDE / Plasma might be worth a shot because it's super customizable out of the box. Kde seems to get more love in updating versions between leap . Tiling Window Manager, for Gnome PopOs has an extension, and for KDE their is a window script if I remember correctly, [ 26/12/2020 17:03:34. That's when I had the epiphany, and it all An operating system is not just the desktop environment used so I wouldn’t say that kde/plasma is more or less secure than gnome, it depends on the distribution you use than the DE. I had Gnome installed before, and to my surprise, Plasma is much smoother than Gnome. People say KDE Plasma is too much like Windows, it's too much customization, or it's too buggy. As for the comparison with windows it is more complicated, I think linux is not inherently safer than windows but in the desktop environment many viruses and KDE Plasma doesn't force anything on the user, you can customize almost everything to fit your needs! For me GNOME has some really bad UI/UX decisions, so Plasma would be the way to go. Its customizable enough with the use of extensions and definitely easier to use. Personally when using KDE The two most popular options are GNOME and KDE Plasma. What is KDE Plasma? KDE Plasma was released in January 2008 and is a lightweight, modern, and customizable desktop 1. If you have less than 4GB of RAM I'd go with XFCE, LXQT or KDE, your pick. Both offer a unique experience, and the right choice for you depends on your personal I like plasma over Gnome currently. What's the difference between these installations? Is it just additional programs? Cons to do what I do, Plasma on ZorinOS 16(. I personally prefer kde over gnome, but gnome is a little more polished It's legally represented by the KDE e. I personally started with gnome and loved it because i came from windows and wanted something that was more "mac-like", and gnome scratched that itch for me BUT, the customization of Plasma is phenominal. I've never seen GNOME go below 1 GB at cold boot. org for user support. While Plasma is catching up, Gnome in recent versions works better on wayland (if not using Nvidia) than it does on X11 since the devs are agressively trying to make it work well on Wayland. I want both to succeed. It allows users to download, install and apply desktop Plasma 5. Gnome has been a bad experience for me too . But i like how customizable it is out of the box. I've been like almost 100% Gnome since 3 came out. The apps included in Plasma are also made by the KDE (also see KDE Gear). Learn about what it has to offer' and is a very popular desktop environment in the os & utilities category. Official releases include Xfce, KDE, Gnome, and the minimal CLI-Installer Architect. IMO KDE-Plasma is much better. 23. ----- This is not a bug tracker. Yes If you're a windows user, running away from Windows, as So, with a clean Arch install and plasma only, for me the desktop runs around 600mb at idle. KDE Connect 2. KDE Plasma is fine, but it has to many customization options, more that I could or would use. Điều này có nghĩa là việc bắt đầu sử dụng KDE làm desktop thường dễ dàng hơn so với GNOME. Conversely, KDE tries to provide complete but at When comparing Gnome vs KDE, the Slant community recommends KDE for most people. In general your personal experience may say gnome is more stable but in reality and if you just take a look at gnome community you’ll see it’s not for Edit: To further clarify, the Plasma desktop is so quick and fluid, productivity has never been higher than ever with my work as being an Economist in the Arabian Gulf Region (primarily Saudi Arabia/ Bahrain), Ubuntu was great and all, but GNOME is unfortunately, not as fluid or quick as Plasma, and I've just been shocked for the past 4 weeks KDE is an international community creating free and open source software. Currently I go back and forth between Gnome and XFCE, as KDE has had screen tearing The "average" is just the average of the three runs (so e. KDE (I only used it for a very short time) Better fractional scaling support. Eventually GNOME 3 would break (with my customizations). Had some stuttering here and there on Gnome. Introducing . Reply reply KDE is an international community creating free and open source software. After Xfce, KDE is the fastest desktop environment. KDE has this out of the box, but I hated the way they handle multiple desktops and multitasking in general. KDE feels like a half baked rip off of Windows. So I forced myself to use KDE. Otherwise, you can use either and it will run pretty well. Apart from that, everyone should use what suits him. 4" and the other 50"). 04 and finally choose XFCE as my favorite DE. I love both. But my preferred desktop environment has been KDE / Plasma for over 20 years. Or check it out in the app stores when compared to Gnome, it is bringing a totally different but equivalent user experience, however Plasma is lighter on resources and Gnome is the default DE for the biggest commercial companies in the Linux industry: Red Hat, Canonical, SUSE are shipping their commercial desktop distro with Gnome 3. Why? Because it was so different. Searching file can be done through dolphin itself in kde while you might install catfish or use find command in xfce. 1 KDE Plasma 5 installed on a 12-year old Dell XPS M1330 (Intel Core 2 Duo T8100, 4GB DDR2 667 MHz RAM, 320GB 5400rpm HDD). "I think everyone can agree that KDE Plasma is easily the most feature-rich desktop environment available on Linux It could be slot of things caused those crashes but I guarantee you GNOME is not more stable than KDE. the way it behaves with the system tray, Alt-Tab Switching, and Softwares/App i just didnt like it . Stable: Both Gnome and KDE are HUGE projects Neither in gnome, nor in kde plasma I am able to configure my screens in an acceptable manner (both are 4k but one is 15. They are the only Desktops that see real technical improvements while desktops like Cinnamon and MATE are slowly going to fade into irrelevancy as they lack the manpower to keep them modern with features such as Wayland. GNOME 2 and Unity, neither of which gives workspaces much thought but whose implementations are otherwise acceptable, tie for second. KDE is about as impactful as changing the wall paper. GNOME offers a cleaner and more distraction-free interface than KDE Plasma. (Not very accurate if you have both installed though). And not what suits others. KDE is When choosing a desktop environment for Linux, KDE and GNOME are two of the most popular options. This guide is useful for users who are new to the Linux ecosystem or existing Plasma: you can make it as you like it, despite being allegedly the most feature rich desktop, it is a good performer, openSUSE has a consolidated tradition on it in that both a slow paced and value stability and well tested updates over flashy new features like Fedora and both GNOME/KDE do (to a certain extend). Overall, you’ll find GNOME to fit your The difference in RAM usage is likely a few (< 100) MB at most [] I don't think it's completely unfair to compare GNOME with Wayland vs KDE on X Let's compare them all on Xorg then, since that's still what most people are using. the preceding year was our income from two mentorship programs, Google Summer of Code and Google Code-in. For me Windows still has the upper edge unfortunately, although Plasma tries to keep up: 2-3 hrs vs 3-4 hrs with Windows. Just choosing regular Manjaro GNOME means they were using Xorg. Performance I dont see a difference between gnome and kde KDE considers itself "full featured" for workstations and business based laptops with many default features others consider useless. 27, but even I'm well satisfied. Also, IMO, the fact that it has a mere fraction of the features as Plasma makes it easier to be feature complete. What are the key differences between KDE and GNOME? Answer: KDE and GNOME differ in their design philosophies and user interfaces. The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome On my secondary (a desktop) I prefer a more traditional desktop layout (like KDE Plasma, Cinnamon, or Gnome + a few extensions. Now that Gnome has VRR and Plasma has proper wayland, feature wise they are the same. It is entirely possible to run modern KDE Plasma 5 with lower usage than default XFCE. GNOME Circle apps are very beautiful, some apps work really well too. I used Gnome xorg for 5/6 months while i waited for nvidia drivers update to fix the awful window drag lag (and some other minor issues), but on KDE was even worse. Controversial. x releases KDE goes from LTS to LTS (5. The hot corner is enabled by default. Kde is more about qt while xfce is more about gtk. Whatever other distro I might use in the future, I'd probably still stick with Gnome. I used Fedora on two laptops: one is a spin with KDE Plasma and the other is running GNOME 42. The Plasma desktop aims to provide a traditional desktop layout comfortable for most W Ultimately, the choice between KDE and GNOME boils down to your individual preferences and priorities: Power Users: If you desire tremendous customizability and want to fine-tune every aspect of your desktop experience, GNOME favors minimalism with a focus on virtual desktops, while KDE Plasma offers a traditional, feature-rich Windows-like experience. Tapi mana yang paling cocok untuk Anda? Ayo cari tahu. The only solution I found was reducing the resolution. I definitely have had far better performance from KDE, even on OpenSuse, than Gnome on any distro, in terms of resource usage. This diversity is rooted in history. Switching from Gnome to KDE with Gnome installed still probably runs those horrific "tracker" processes. New versions of GNOME come out every six months. Org Xfce X. Ease of use is highly subjective to the individual user. org to report bugs. KIO will try to open a browser via another application in the Zorin Desktop and it makes the Graphic driver crash. KDE will preserve a more windows like workflow so if you like that or don't care to change go with KDE. Its just so efficient and convenient for this workflow. Org AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core @ 3. Budgie is a nice de, but if you really want a gnome style desktop, budgie might not be able to be changed enough to achieve that. Luckily it is super easy to switch between them in *buntu, and have multiple ones installed. Please visit https://discuss. Laptop specifications: Intel CORE I5 10th gen . Hello everyone I am about to install Manjaro right after this topic gets answered. Then xfce and kde use x11 whereas gnome uses wayland. 04 LTE & 20. It can be customised to do most of what gnome does, but the kde version of the overview isn't as nice compared to gnome de. In the question "What are the best and most beautiful desktop environments for UNIX-like systems?" KDE Plasma is ranked 2nd while Gnome is ranked 3rd. If you ever happen to give it a try just to figure out if battery life is truly better in KDE than in GNOME in identical configuration, please let me know. I've been solely using WMs for ages now and I don't see that changing any time soon. Sway meanwhile is less user friendly by default. com, etc. To add to the list here, 10 year old X220, 2nd gen i5, 8GB RAM, SSD. So why should the millions of people using GNOME or KDE Plasma be forced to use a UI primarily inspired by touch? KDE seems to, for now at least, understand this, and that makes it the last popular mouse-first desktop KDE vs GNOME. KDE has a smaller userbase which use an inestimable number of workflows(For example: Windows XP default, Windows 7/10/Manjaro and macOS-like using Latte dock). 3): Installing KDE Plasma and SDDM breaks Zorin's stability for ever; Switching DE's makes Gnome complain because GTK modules conflict with overruling QT application of the same. 1 release from February 2022 is: GNOME 42 - Major release update of the popular desktop environment KDE Plasma The KDE team also implemented “hot-corner” in the top-left corner of your desktop to activate the workspace view via mouse cursor. It has a clean interface, a top panel with icons, and access to accessibility options (if enabled). Overview of open windows and virtual desktops were also touchscreen friendly Comparison of look and feel between the three popular Linux desktops - GNOME, KDE Plasma and XFCE. The user interface generally involves the type of layout, icons, theme, widgets, and other components of a GUI. Org vs. So here it is a summary : 0) -I don’t know why there is 2 app for system monitoring (ksysguard Verdict: The ideal desktop would have KDE’s Activities plus GNOME 3’s automatic arrangement of applications. : Kubuntu in its own VM, KDE installed on Ubuntu and started after fresh boot, KDE installed on Ubuntu and started after logging in and out with another user in another desktop). Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month. KDE Plasma vs. Gnome 2,KDE 3-5, mate, cinnamon, xfce, compiz have either a pager or overview displaying a visual metaphor of a grid either with a default configuration of a 2x2 arrangement or with a configurable number of rows and columns. Plasma looks like what you'd expect if you're coming from Windows, with its bottom panel, menu, and task manager, and the defaults are clean and simple, rather welcoming for a new user. Use wayland if your gpu is AMD. No particularly good reason to stay with x11 now (unless you like disabling compositor). It is a free and open-source desktop environment. GNOME aims to provide most complete experience out of the box, which might be opinionated, but requires no tinkering. 256 GB SSD . KDE on my desktops/workstations. I'm happy that Linux has two super solid choices GNOME is described as '3 has been designed from the ground up to help you have the best possible computing experience. But it gives way more functionality without hacks (the extensions to gnome, pardon me, degrade the slick experience a lot). Well to be honest there are some specifics in each. Compare GNOME 3 vs KDE Plasma and 14 other options side by side to learn "What are the best UNIX-like desktop environments with high DPI support for retina displays?" April 22, 2020. 2. This proposal, while serious, was mostly intended to stir up discussion about the position of the Fedora KDE spin within the larger Fedora community, and it seems this has had its intended effect. Gnome vs. You can set/change them from withing the Gnome/KDE DEs, without having to logout and log back in the DE, and those changes immediately apply to all SW reading/using those environment variables. Which does not mean that Gnome is bad in general. Let's get started here! The choice between KDE and GNOME ultimately depends on your preferences and use case. Among those have been nepomuk, akonadi, baloo and a few others. Gnome while KDE Plasma can be customized to mostly mimic the Gnome Shell workflow. Plasma 5 is terrible because Activities and Virtual Desktops are completely separate now. I used to use Gnome (Back when I used Ubuntu), but after trying Kubuntu and using KDE, I couldn't ever go back. KDE/Plasma - powerful, customizable, practical, flexible, best experience on modern ( =<5yo ) systems. f. Wayland Radeon Linux Gaming Performance With Ubuntu 18. 715 paint_all ERROR] [KDE Plasma 6] First time ricing and using Linux, something simple. Controversial opinion: only Gnome and KDE matter. 34 I believe in 15. Gnome on laptops & my 'tv'. I'd go with either KDE or XFCE like the other gentlemen suggested. Almost every time I need an app and I evaluate Gnome and KDE alternatives, Gnome app is lacking one or two key features that KDE one has. KDE Plasma User Experience. From my perspective I can tell you that the most “loaded” projects don’t even play in Gnome. Interview KDE Plasma is a Linux desktop environment which has just been updated to 5. KDE on both X and Wayland has still so much work to do. Yes, that's right, the matchup of a life time!It's all about the DE. Example: Gimp and inkscape, probably because they are developed in gtk+. com, gnome-look. While I was looking for Manjaro XFCE vs KDE Comparison, most of the pages have been unfortunately lost on the forum, while the other sites had very old version comparisons I have a 6-GB RAM, 2nd gen Intel i3 Hello to all, I want to say that KDE is an awesome linux DE : But i found some limitation and I try to address it in that topic for people who care. GNOME vs. If you have the patience and time to muck around in the settings of KDE, you can also give it a go. Betadoggo_ • It depends on your specs. If you don't need those "features" turn them off in Autostart. 0: GNOME vs. Based on some work from one of the developers, the next release may get even closer and more flexible. Not a full install though, just plasma-desktop (wayland) with it's dependencies and the tools I need. 14+ on ubuntu 18. Pro. It’s fast even on old machine (tried it on i7-860 with 6 GB RAM and Santa ssd, connected to sata 3Gbit/s, works pretty good), simple and works fine for me (I tried older style XFCE on Debian 9 and dislike it’s UI). You've also got Gnome currently missing VRR, whereas Sway and KDE support it. Essentially its a GUI part of your distribution. Clear Linux Rolling Out KDE Plasma Desktop Support, Plus Some Benchmarks Against GNOME Shell Operating Systems : 2018-08-28: KDE vs. Moreover, I need to reconnect the HDMI cable after a screen lock in kde plasma to The process of adding widgets or applets to the KDE desktop is an easy matter of just right-clicking on the bottom of the desktop. Org Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL Vulkan Compiler File-System Screen Resolution GNOME Wayland GNOME X. A large number of desktop use cases are Cinnamon is less configurable than Gnome + extensions is and heavier on resources than the latest Gnome releases (3. At Gnome, there is more like a really long time, till something gets merged (with long, i mean 1-4 years). These will be the most resource-intensive software I'll be running. But Gnome is my happy place where everything makes sense to me. I was a Gnome user before installing KDE so it might please more for people coming from Gnome but also anyone else. I'd recommend to try the manjaro-i3 live system, as this is already configured, just to see how you like the paradigm. If you plan on running multiple applications at once, Xfce gives you optimal performance. I dont want this to turn into a DE war lol. There are more than 25 alternatives to GNOME for a variety of platforms, including Linux, BSD, Windows, Mac and Linux Mobile apps. Alternatively, look around on Google Images for screenshots of Gnome or KDE. While both desktop environments offer powerful customization and reliability, they have distinct design philosophies. Gnome just doesn't appeal to me as much as Plasma. I love the features that Plasma has to offer, but I find it overall to be less stable and more buggy (especially on Wayland) than I find GNOME to be. For some perspective: I have openSUSE Leap 15. It works flawless. VD's in Plasma 5 can't even However, before KDE plasma, KDE was released under the name of the K desktop environment and comes via popular Linux distributions such as Ubuntu and Fedora. However, you can also mimic the workflow of almost any other desktop. But main reason is probably the overall KDE ecosystem. It's sometimes called just KDE because, duh, it shorter. Wireless yes. So now I use it on Manjaro. So for the people who use either Plasma or GNOME, I guess my question is why you chose one over the GNOME favors minimalism with a focus on virtual desktops, while KDE Plasma offers a traditional, feature-rich Windows-like experience. If you want a desktop environment really configurable go with KDE Plasma: once upon a time Mint Hi-DPI multi monitor support is in a different league on gnome. It would be really interesting to see a power consumption comparison between KDE, gnome and maybe xfce. KDE apps sometimes have UI elements scattered in random places, but Gnome apps often have UI elements hidden from view in random places. When they changed the way they were going with Gnome 3, I hated it with a passion. 20 - but why should users consider it instead of GNOME, the default for Ubuntu and Red Hat, or the lightweight Xfce? We spoke to Plasma maintainers David Edmundson and Jonathan Riddell. in on Sep 29, 2020. 40GHz With KDE Plasma there's a default shortcut for disabling the compositor, at least on X11 (Alt+Shift+F12), but I am not aware if there's something similar on Gnome. For this reason, KDE and GNOME 3 tie for first in this category. Though they serve the same purpose they do look differently. Both of them are very popular. I made several changes, customized the hell outta my desktop and then realized I'd basically recreated the Gnome experience. a desktop that combined the best of KDE's Plasma desktop and GNOME's desktop. I don't really like any of Examples of Desktop Environments include KDE, XFCE, and GNOME. KDE Plasma là lựa chọn tốt nhất nếu bạn đang tìm kiếm một DE có thư viện ứng dụng lớn đã có sẵn ngay lập tức. To me, Gnome is second to none in any situation where your workflow is primarily keyboard + gestures (either touchpad or I suppose touchscreen). Seriously. If a lot of them start with G, you're on Gnome. Hence arch with kde. In addition, the workspace view search is superfast, which searches the open windows as well as the apps (when there are no Plasma decided to honor the demand by GNOME/GTK3-with-headerbar applications to be run with CSD. e. I was a KDE user, then switched to gnome for a long time because of some glitches and bugs, and i taught i would never go back, but recently vanilla gnome is too minimalistic, so i used extensions, but with a system that updates frequently i had a lot of issues with extensions getting out of date and stopped working, that was in fedora, then i switched to Opensuse tumbleweed Gnome and Plasma are both as you would expect them to be. Extensions trend to break with a new GNOME version, some even crash your session entirety (Pano). Manjaro is a GNU/Linux distribution based on Arch. In this video I discuss whether using Gnome or KDE Plasma makes any difference to gaming performance, and if not, what does? KDE Plasma seems to be the better choice, since GNOME seems to have alot of flaws, and Xfce lacks customizability. GNOME, X. I always ended back with GNOME 3 (and many customizations). Until Plasma 5 series KDE Plasma (with KDE Applications and Framework) have two major releases per year. 18. Now, I'm using Arch with KDE Plasma. and the KDE Free Qt Foundation. 8 GB Ram, Type: DDR4, Frequency: 2666 MHz . Customizing the Desktop Gnome and KDE are Desktop Environments. Before that, I didn't like Gnome and was a solid XFCE guy. 1 TB HDD . KDE prioritizes customization and power-user features, offering extensive Explore the features and differences between two popular Linux desktop environments, GNOME and KDE Plasma. KDE ships software in more parts, such as KDE Plasma, KDE Frameworks, and KDE Gear. I prefer KDE (and Qt stuff in general) over GNOME (and GTK+ stuff in general) for a number of reasons, the latest being that KDE (and Qt) actually respect the DPI settings of your X server, whereas GTK3 stopped using it, and requires you to set the unrelated Xft. A standard KDE desktop is installed with: sudo apt install kde-standard . In the question "What are the best desktop environments for people migrating from Windows to Linux?" Plasma Desktop generally comes Manjaro KDE plasma or xfce I'm currently trying out new distros, and I may use either PyCharm or VS Code. Outside of that, KDE is better in every single way I can think of measuring. 27. Came from gnome. Let's get started here! Explore the features and differences between two popular Linux desktop environments, GNOME and KDE Plasma. 2 cinnamon for my LAMP stack test laptop. For, gnome vs kde it is more personal preference. Tbh, I feel a little bad when using GNOME, because I can feel how much KDE and Plasma have pushed user friendliness and kept expert features at the same time, while GNOME and their applocations feel much more like you get what we have, but (unfortunetly) Plasma lacks GNOME's workflow and apps that are size convwrgent. Debian is a fully-functional rock solid stable distribution *GNU/Linux which is hugely popular and many many distribution use it as a base like Ubuntu, Parrot,Kali,MX and many many more and started from very beginning of Linux and Open Source Imitative time maybe in 1993 by Ian Mordock. kde. Old. Installed separate versions of OpenSUSE Linux on three sep Despite the turmoil in the world, we are thrilled to be bringing you an awesome update with Kali Linux 2020. news/TLE to to know where your news is coming from. I tried KDE Plasma wayland for a month, and even tho the animations and the UI were both pretty smooth, I noticed a terrible gaming experience, much worse than GNOME, where even Go to https://ground. Pling-Store is an Installer and Content Management App for OCS-compatible websites like pling. KDE Wayland vs. Grab a brand new l All the while ignoring KDE (I had a bad experience with it before the Plasma days). Some games run rather poorly with the compositor enabled, and/or aren't able to trigger the OS to automatically disable it in full-screen, so it can be useful to have a shortcut to manually control it. In the question "What are the best UNIX-like desktop environments with high DPI support for retina displays?" GNOME is ranked 1st I used Fedora on two laptops: one is a spin with KDE Plasma and the other is running GNOME 42. However, some clear patterns emerge when evaluating GNOME vs KDE for beginner-friendliness. Earlier this year, a proposal was made to replace the primary edition of Fedora from the GNOME variant to the KDE variant. I LOVE KDE. Org KDE Plasma Wayland KDE Plasma X. If you go to the About page of your computers settings panel, that should give you some clues. For a complete set of KDE applications and Plasma desktop" sudo apt install kde-full. Also it doesn't look bad with non kde Apps While kde Apps look horrible in gnome. Table 1. The choice between KDE and GNOME ultimately depends on your preferences and use case. I tried to look up DE power consumption some I have an Envy x360 (4500u + touchscreen) and have run gnome 40/41 and KDE 5. The primary difference between Kubuntu an Neon is that under Kubuntu you have to wait for the regular 6 month cycle to get your DE (Plasma) updated. Difference mostly comes down to personal preference. They offer distinct approaches to the graphical user interface that sits on top of the Linux operating system. Graphic Processor: Intel Integrated UHD I use Dash to Panel to combine the dash and the top panel to give me a more "Windows-like" layout. However, from the Plasma 6 onwards, the team may release once a year with more stability and features. The killer feature for GNOME gaming for me is how seamlessly it "alt-tabs" (even though its handled differently). In my test rig at the office I'm using Kubuntu. Now I most prefer KDE. While created for different reasons, both are generically extensible and can be used to exchange data, synchronize state and send requests and signals between peers. The summary of the changelog since the 2022. The others are following, but GNOME and KDE had Wayland support since years. Up until Gnome 41, Gnome would also The KDE developers seem to pride themselves on destroying previously working features with each release. Plasma is the most feature packed one, and I love that! First of all, I love the one bar design basically since windows 95. In this KDE Plasma vs GNOME comparison guide, we will examine the strengths, weaknesses, and distinctive features of each environment. I had a really hard time with gnome on my desktop but literally no problem on my laptop. Both default setups of KDE and GNOME are simply legible. They simply work, and that’s what most people are after, apart from having more features and customization options. Gnome, KDE and Sway (and some other wlroots-based compositors) support that, so probably most of them do at this poinh. KDE stays at around 500-600 MB, XFCE uses 150-200 MB tops. This is easy to plan around, which is part of the reason some distros plan their own release schedule around GNOME's. V. x. I don't like the design language. Like another person here, I used XFCE after GNOME was neutered and during the tumultuous period of KDE Plasma 4. Installing kde over gnome will give you a partially broken kde experience as already existing settings from gnome will KDE is surprisingly light, inspite of all of the stuff it has. 2) 15. Visit our main page to know more: https://kde. Has mouse wheel scrolling speed adjustment (Wayland). Applications like Discord and Spotify can go up over 700mb of ram usage. Scaling is global in kde plasma and absolutely unstable in gnome. If you love blur affect, kde gives you blur affacts out of box while xfce need additional compositor for that. 04 LTS Linux Gaming : 2018-05-12: Using Dual 4K Monitors Stacked With GNOME Monitors : 2018-01-23 So what is it about KDE Plasma that I love so much, and why do I think it’s better than GNOME? KDE Offers a Familiar and Functional User Interface By default, KDE Plasma has always looked similar to Windows, with current iterations looking like a Significantly reduced in 2020 vs. I tried customising it and it really just didn't work. I want one bar with an application menu, Scan this QR code to download the app now. KDE is too overwhelming for me. Each has its own release schedule. you can truly make your desktop look however you want on it. I used GNOME for about 3 years, before switching to KDE Plasma. Lol if they were using GNOME Wayland, KDE very much is like Windows, which is why I love it, in spite of Windows' problems, at its core it's an excellently designed user interface that's been marred by years of maligned and inconsistent features, but the core interface is great in my opinion, and KDE heavily leans on that interface design, whereas Gnome heavily leans on the OSX Plasma is the desktop environment used by Kubuntu. Firstly, I couldn’t find the newbie section, so sorry for posting here. KDE Plasma is the desktop environment made by KDE. Q&A. Kde is bug riddled I could find a new defect every minute. Feeling like I wasn't giving it a fair chance, I went to the Gnome website and looked at their design philosophy. I’ve been reading some articles and some people say that Plasma 6’s ram usage is comparable to xfce, which I’ve tested on my own and clearly xfce consumes so much less ram on every Compared to KDE Plasma. I agree, Gnome feels polished, but as you said, it's very different. This release has various impressive updates, all of which are ready for immediate download or updating. . Like kde uses qt and gnome and xfce use gtk. Then I upgraded my laptops RAM to 8 GBs and the HDD to an SSD, this time I They were using Xorg for both. 18 LTS in Leap 15. org ----- This is not a technical support forum. KDE Vs GNOME Vs Xfce; which is more user-friendly? Xfce has a simple and classic look but is packed with plenty of Linux Gaming - GNOME vs. I tried KDE Plasma for a while, and I still have it installed just in case I want to try it out again. In Linux, a desktop environment consists of a collection of elements bundled together to provide common graphical user interface What is KDE Now, I can fully say that I've definitely switched from GNOME to KDE Plasma. I have Okular installed on my Windows machines too. We must've touched a nerve, because the net went wild. It’s that time of year again, time for another Kali Linux release! Quarter #2 - Kali Linux 2022. GNOME requires extra tools for customization with limited theming capabilities, In this guide, we shall discuss KDE Plasma Vs GNOME. Only the problem with the KDE’s approach is to be that, as many things KDE, the feature which users are Xfce leaves things for which you might have to use terminal. I'm also on a hybrid graphics system and it uses the intel card well. Some thoughts for you: When comparing GNOME vs KDE Plasma, the Slant community recommends GNOME for most people. plasma and probably kde apps by themselves will get support in plasma 6 (or their respective qt 6 versions). It has limited customizability but is good enough for new users. Mind you, that I'm using NixOS Stable channel, so I only get Plasma 5. Give KDE Plasma a try. Funny, because Mr Torvalds expressed his approbation for KDE around 2-3 years ago, around the time I have re-started using it after a few years on Mate. The latter is to ensure that the dual-licensed Qt software used by KDE stays open source. Manjaro GNOME doesn't use Wayland, you have to specifically choose Wayland. In this comprehensive guide, we‘ll compare GNOME and KDE across several categories to help you decide which is best for your needs and preferences. KDE Plasma is very smooth and comes with a very good assortment of utilities that make everything easier. Gnome will be 3. dpi resource or environment variables such as GTK_SCALE or CLUTTER_SCALE. vfaek sllcm nucqk llqeorab njij vaxduk zasmlf row vfydf uhbt